Marcel Odenbach: A look at art in the service of democracy

Marcel Odenbach is a German video artist . One of the German video artists, together with media artist Klaus from the break and the sculptor, video and performance artist Ulrike Rosenbach, forms Marcel Odenbach the trio of internationally best known German video artists (who has also been working together since the 1970s).

Marcel Odenbach is internationally renowned, but his life and work remain deeply rooted in his birthplace: He was born in Cologne on July 7, 1953, has lived primarily in Cologne ever since, held a professorship and served as Vice-Rector at the Academy of Media Arts Cologne for many years, and is currently featured in We Call It Ludwig. The Museum Turns 40!” at the Museum Ludwig in Ai Weiwei, Candida Claes Gerhard Rosemarie Trockel (you can learn more about the participating artists and the anniversary exhibition in the Kunstplaza article: “Anniversary Exhibition 2016: Museum Ludwig Presents Museum Ludwig” and in individual artist portraits).

Marcel Odenbach is currently ranked # 474 . It has been led among the 500 most important contemporary artists for decades and has scratched 300th place around 2008.

A versatile artist and his multi -layered art

Marcel Odenbach studied art, including from 1974 to 1979 at the Aachen Technical University . No practical art, but art history , and not just art, but also architecture and semiotics .

Semiotics is the drawing theory, science that deals with sign systems. It shapes and examines the effect of signs of all kinds, image writing, gestures, formula signs, language -forming characters such as letters, rules such as traffic signs.

The numerous conspiracy theorists who are currently traveling can now begin to look for hidden signs in Marcel Odenbach's art. But be careful, Marcel Odenbach's art is full of signs that cannot be seen immediately for every dödel. However, they point to real political difficulties, the strenuous and necessary combat of which the conspiracy theorists want to avoid their creative repression practice.

In 1976, Marcel Odenbach and fellow students (still studying) founded the “ATV Producers Group”, which will be discussed further below.

1978, perhaps as a creative break before the stressful degree of studies, Odenbach had an extraordinary productive year:

“Keeping Yourself in Good Spirits!” from 1978 deals in 13 sequences alternately with the theme of play (rules of the game and their observance, change, overturning), which is contrasted with uncut recordings of scenes that capture the politically heated climate of the hunt for terrorists in the “hot autumn” of Germany in 1977.

With "The Great Misunderstanding," created in the same year, Odenbach reached a wider public for the first time. "The Great Misunderstanding" is an ironic performance, a parody of the recently fashionable art form of performance art, in which Odenbach, as the "ruler's fool" or (artistic) variety artist, performs his magic tricks to give those who profit from art and the art recipients (who are simultaneously and equally used for profit) – the real attraction, that is, "The Great Misunderstanding" – the opportunity to perform while watching and evaluating what is presented.

The artwork was presented in Basel, arguably the most important international art market alongside Cologne, and Odenbach was not bothered at the time that he was able to formulate his critique of “art and art reception in modern times” precisely through the support of a Swiss gallery .

Something we probably still need to take as a model today is that the money always stays with the protagonists of the exploitative, inhumane, environmentally destructive systems that must be fought “for the good of the world”.

Also from 1978: “I think I have lost myself”, a performance recorded on video, which, using the scenario “the artist and his loneliness in the exhibition business”, describes in fairly clear symbolism the feelings that introverted artists suffer when presenting their works in public, and “When the elephant becomes an ivory trader” , a photographic work on the “German Autumn” of RAF terrorism, which at the same time criticizes the significance of technology as a modern instrument of domination.

Currently, the work “Making a Picture of a Picture” from 2016 can be seen at the anniversary exhibition of the Museum Ludwig, about which only this much should be revealed: it contains a perfidious search game in which typical Nazi art has to be searched for.

Many more videos have been created between 1978 and the present day, which you are welcome to discover. To pique your curiosity, here is a short selection of titles (which in itself constitutes a kind of "cover story"):

As if memories could be deceptive, the silence of German spaces scares me, the consumption of my own criticism, the distance between me and my losses, the falsehood of reason or: tried to sleep over the problem, three -hand piano concert for horrificly versatile instruments, a day by the east and west, turn in the circles, in silent ponds crocodiles, men stories 1, it has my head, it has my head, twisted as long as the ball rolls, do not fall, do not fall, silent movements, traumatic tropics, disturbed places, wine, child, if the wall moves to the table, too good to be true ...

Marcel Odenbach has often explained why he (so happy) works with the medium video:

• “Since video combines three different elements, a) the image, b) the sequence of actions, c) the sound, to demonstrate the power of technology and progress in society.
• Since the television picture of today's viewing habits corresponds more than the panel picture.
• Because television, as a pastime with its high entertainment value, has triggered social, i.e., political changes “to a great extent”.
• Since media analysis and criticism has become a central topic of our society.
• Since I can theoretically address a larger group of recipients than the museum visitors.
• Since my visual representation can no longer be used as a decorative and representative wall jewelry.
• Because art loses part of its character of the goods.
• Because I can offer more comprehensive alternatives!”

(cited from www.medienkunstnetz.de)

Nevertheless, he has always made the blackboard pictures disqualified in this statement (which simply means two-dimensional images), next to and/or in preparation for his video work.

In the USA, it is primarily these "chalkboard paintings" that are associated with the artist Marcel Odenbach and that have made him famous. Here, Marcel Odenbach's chalkboard art is still something of a hidden gem, waiting to be discovered. Here are some insights into this aspect of Odenbach's artistic work:

• 1975: “If this continues…” from: Saying of the Month, pencil and colored pencil on paper, three parts
• 1977: “Keeping oneself in good spirits”, collage and concept for the video work of the same title, pencil, colored pencil, ink on paper, three parts
• 2004: “Newcomer”, collage, ink on paper
• 2005: Marcel Odenbach, “March 20, 2003”, collage, photocopy and cardboard on paper, ink, pencil
• 2006: Marcel Odenbach, “Daylight”, collage, photo and gouache on paper
• 2010: Marcel Odenbach, “Probeliegen”, collage, ink and pencil on paper
• 2012: Marcel Odenbach, “Sitzfleisch”, collage, photocopy and cardboard on paper, ink, pencil
• 2013: “Filed and Hung Up”, collage, ink on paper

Marcel Odenbach: public life, exhibitions, awards

Since 1992, Odenbach has taught as a professor at the State University of Design Karlsruhe and the Cologne University of Media, and in Cologne he was also Vice -Presector from the art college for a while.

In the 2010 summer semester, Odenbach was appointed ordinary professor to the Düsseldorf Art Academy, since then he has been teaching film and video there.

He was also elected to the North Rhine-Westphalian Academy of Sciences and the Arts in 2010.

Marcel Odenbach Art was seen 300 exhibitions 50 individual exhibitions and 250 group exhibitions in all important exhibition locations and sites of contemporary art.

With MoMA New York and Hamburg train station Museum for the Present Berlin, Kunst- und Exhibition Hall of the FRG Bonn and Kunstraum Düsseldorf, de Appel Center for Contemporary Art Amsterdam and Badischer Kunstverein Karlsruhe, Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía Madrid and Musée D´Art Contemporain Monttréal, Center Pompidou Paris and Folkwang Museum Essen, Academy of the Arts Berlin and Latvian National Museum of Arts Riga, Museum of Contemporary Art Kraków and Moscow Museum of Modern Art, Sharjah Art Foundation and South African National Gallery Cape Town, Para/Site Art Space Hong Kong and Museum of Contemporary Art Sydney and the Taipei Fine Arts Museum. Have you ever become an artist because he likes to travel through the world?

With the 41st Biennale of Venice 1984, the 18 ° Bienal de Sao Paulo 1985, the 19 ° Bienal de Sao Paulo and Documenta 8 Kassel 1987, the 25 ° Bienal de São Paulo 2002, 8th International İstanbul Biennial 2003. Biennale (triennale, quadriennale, quintessential)?

Art by Marcel Odenbach can be viewed in the following public collections :

• Germany : Hamburger Bahnhof Museum for the Present Berlin, Kunstmuseum Bonn, Kolumba and Museum Ludwig Cologne, Cottbus Art Museum, Cottbus Museum, Museum of Modern Art Frankfurt/Main, Hamburger Kunsthalle, Center for Art and Media Technology Karlsruhe, Kunsthalle to Kiel, Gallery for Contemporary Art Leipzig, Pinakothek der Moderne Munich
• France : Frac des Pays de la Loire Carquefou, Center Pompidou Paris
• Italy : Collezione Maramotti, Reggio Emilia
• Canada : Musée des Beaux-Arts du Canada, Ottawa, on
• Liechtenstein : Liechtenstein Art Museum, Vaduz
• Hungary : Ludwig Museum Museum of Contemporary Art, Budapest

The collage “Zugezogen” from 2004 was included in the official collection of contemporary art of the Federal Republic of Germany .

Legendary stories about Marcel Odenbach

No scandals to be made, Marcel Odenbach simply lives and works. Characteristic of his pleasantly laconic manner is the following short sentence from the art talk “Seven Years Later” about the exhibition “Political Populism” at the Kunsthalle Wien:

Interviewer:

The works in the exhibition "Political Populism" were more or less selected by you yourself, so to speak, you brought them together on this theme. I find it extremely interesting that there's a series with the striking title "German Symbol," and two of the German symbols are Volkswagen and Deutsche Bank, which have once again gained notoriety this year due to scandals, so to speak, that the very nature of the successful German industrial company or the German banking group has been fundamentally called into question. But actually, these works also originated from a different context – why did you specifically choose the German symbol for political populism?

Marcel Odenbach: “That’s overinterpreted, of course I took what was available…” (abbreviated for content only, in fact Odenbach adapted to the interviewer’s style of speech and answered even more, can be heard/seen in the following video).

Marcel Odenbach's work and the future

Marcel Odenbach began to pass on his knowledge before his fourth decade of life was completed as a professor at the State University of Design Karlsruhe, the Kunsthochschule für Medien Cologne and the Düsseldorf Art Academy.

As a decent member of the North Rhine-Westphalian Academy of Sciences and Arts, he has also been part of a scholarly company since 2010 that advises the state government on performing its tasks in the field of science and art, whereby the academy members are heard primarily in the area of ​​suggestion and promotion of new research projects.

Furthermore, the members of the seven German country academies maintain a lively scientific exchange of ideas with each other and with other scientific institutions in Germany or abroad, support the young scientific and shape the regular public events of the academies.

Just as Marcel Odenbach always loved to combine explosive socio-political issues with a seemingly banal topic, today he uses the framework of “fine art” for political engagement.

For example, in 2008 in an artist talk with Werner Gephart and Stephan Berg at the Bonn Art Museum (it's about "the right in the image", see the following video No. 1, further discussion in front of Odenbach's works -> video No. 2) or in the art talk "seven years later" from 2015 on the exhibition Political Populism at the Kunsthalle Wien (November 6, 2015 to February 7, 2016, art talk on YouTube: see video above).

Video No. 1 – “Law in the Picture”

His art is never loud and rough, but very finely woven up the aftermath of National Socialism in the present and other unsustainable conditions. Wache art fans will continue to pursue political side of modern art Our time really has enough for political engagement.

An early idea of ​​Odenbach's could prove interesting in connection with the question of the future of our television, which is currently up for decision: During his training as an artist, which encompassed several courses of study, Marcel Odenbach founded the “ATV Producers Group” .

ATV stands for alternatively TV, it is the first TV pirate station based in Cologne.

Odenbach, Rosenbach and from the break, four decades ago, the private form of the publication, which is currently confusing the entire media landscape. The artist trio, which was barely imagined at the time, was directed to the fact that members of the media industry, which are particularly professioned in the media industry, do not make the program and send out the program, but that the normal citizen (interested) sends information, while at the same time represents the potential recipients of this information.

“We make our own television ,” was the slogan, a provocation at the time: Television sets had only been widespread in households in significant numbers for about a decade, and color had only appeared on screens a few years earlier; for the average citizen, television producers were authority figures who disseminated selected and didactically presented snippets of their privileged knowledge to the public. It was unheard of for a few young artists to believe they could make television themselves.

Today, almost nothing is unheard of, and visual messages from citizens to citizens are commonplace. What was once "knowledge from the ruling class" has become "knowledge for all citizens" available via the internet, without those in positions of power revealing to all citizens how to verify whether a source contains fact or lies. The following is an excerpt from the TV talk show "Maischberger" on the topic of "lying press ," in which Pegida supporter and AfD member Joachim Radke expresses his views:

The rest of the sentence goes under in general murmur.

Sandra Maischberger intervenes in a moderating role: “… it’s still a problem, and I have to address this again, this ‘coordination’, which is a major criticism from your side as well, and the second thing is…” … she touches on further topics, journalist Ulrich Wickert comments on one of these topics.

As soon as he gets a chance to speak, blogger and social media expert Sascha Lobo : “Did you seriously just claim on German television that the Gleichschaltung (coordination) today was more drastic than in the GDR?”

Radke: “They didn’t listen to me; I said it’s not as bad as it was back then in East Germany.”

Lobo: “Then I formulated that as a question correctly, but I would still really ask you to simply look up on Wikipedia – you are a big fan of the internet – what Gleichschaltung really means, and to use this word, which was coined in National Socialism, a little more thoughtfully and perhaps not so sloppily; just like Lügenpresse, you can say that in the same way.”

"Why don't you start to understand that you're sitting here in front of millions of viewers, seriously telling the story that this conformity is suppressing your opinion? Why don't you start to realize what an absurdity this is – surely you can't not understand that…"

Radke: “Perhaps you should realize that you are constantly trying to intellectually elevate yourselves.”

With the rest of the quoted program to look at YouTube (video has unfortunately been removed), Joachim Radke received a lot of applause in the comments, while Sascha Lobo was showered with insults.

Sorry, but Radke said that the Gleichschaltung (coordination) in East German television was “not as drastic” as it is today, as can be seen from the above verbatim transcript, and was understood exactly the same way by Lobo and Maischberger.

The word synchronization describes the first phase of the seizure of power of the National Socialists, the process of unification of the entire social and political life initiated in 1933, the first phase of the abolition of democracy .

Anyone who publicly claims that the media working in a democracy is aligned with the correct interpretation according to historically guaranteed terms that the work of this media is not in line with the democratic basic order that it aims to abolish democracy.

This in turn is a direct attack on this democracy, in which these media perform democratic tasks in the context of the constitutional order; Democratic -minded citizens are rightly very difficult with such statements.

In German-speaking countries, media outlets that held a different opinion than one's own have always been attacked as "lying press"

The Nazis initially defamed everyone who still had the courage to write against anti-Semitic conspiracy theories "lying press" "coordinated" (murdered, driven out of the country, silenced through imprisonment and other forms of coercion), the media of the later wartime enemies were vilified as "lying press" - a term that democratically committed citizens no longer want to hear today.

Tichy's insight is an (online) monthly magazine by the former Helmut Kohl employee Roland Tichy , who, in the opinion of experts (who has studied politics and have worked with politics for at least 8 hours on each of their working days after completing their studies, has been (departed) quite far to the right since then.

This assessment casts doubt on the suitability of this publication for forming a neutral opinion. Furthermore, Radke, who works as a bus driver for the Berlin public transport company, will soon no longer be reading this magazine anyway: until the Maischberger program, he hadn't realized that "Einblick" presents itself as an opinion and monthly magazine for the liberal-conservative elite, thus addressing the very people Radke opposes.

The national weekly newspaper “Junge Freiheit” was examined by political scientists and classified as a “mouthpiece of the New Right” and to the “border area between conservatism and right-wing extremism” ; there is no “neutral opinion” here either.

achgut.com leads to the “Axis of Good”, also an opinion platform for political outsiders, which, with its proximity to the Swiss Weltwoche, is certainly more right than left of center.

Jung und Naiv, whose full title is “Jung & Naiv – Politik für Disintersierte” (Young & Naive – Politics for the Disinterested) , is a regularly broadcast political interview program. Journalist and host Tilo Jung wants politicians to give answers that even 14-year-olds could understand; foreign words are not allowed, and technical terms must be explained from the ground up.

That sounds like if the interviews were excellent sources of information for citizens who, due to their upbringing in a dictatorship, still have difficulty understanding the cornerstones of the democratic order. In fact, they are not because the experimental concept dispenses with any political orientation and thus presupposes exactly that secured democracy knowledge and understanding acquired in long years of school, which Mr. Radke obviously has to acquire through his information work.

Radke himself proves this by citing his sources: ARD and ZDF , three sources from the right-wing spectrum and an “experimental explainer page” are not a suitable basis for forming a “neutral opinion”.

With all due respect for the differing opinions of fellow citizens (and all the sympathy of the typical Berliner for “his” Berlin bus drivers), it is the duty of every democratically minded citizen in a democracy to point out this fact to people like Mr. Radke in an unintellectual and exaggerated manner.

Returning to the entire content offering of the medium of television and to television consumption (apart from talk shows on socio-political topics, apart from one's own pirate radio station), to which Marcel Odenbach already commented in the work “The Consumption of My Own Criticism” , 1976 – 1979.

Regarding this work and his critique of consumerism, Odenbach explained: “[In my work] I am concerned with the preservation of the passive consumer attitude in television… Television… necessitates passive consumption, since ratings are crucial for program planning. Time and opportunities to offer an alternative are wasted through commercial entertainment programs… Due to the narcotic effect of the media, it is very difficult for the consumer to recognize their own consumption” (abridged quote from: medienkunstnetz.de/werke/der-konsum-meiner-eigenen-kritik ).

That was in 1976, since then passive consumption in front of the television has driven the average weight up in the population; In the United States, a special trade for oversized recliners (television armchairs) was created, in which extreme cases such as this: Kurzelinks.de/QMSQ no longer fit in.

Since then, the program to be consumed has taken more quality back steps, a small highlight of the development towards increasingly stupid television formed September 30, 2016, on which one plus and ZDF culture were switched off.

Eins Plus was the “youth channel”, which, in addition to rather embarrassing magazines and series, brought concerts, shows, comedy, films, advice, knowledge and information to the screen and was therefore also interesting for every older person with an interest in the development of our world.

ZDF culture covered the areas of music, performing arts, film culture, network culture and gaming; Together with the third programs, both transmitters took a good percentage part of what was not yet an early -wasted consumer under the remote control.

Eins Plus is replaced by “One”: “One for you, the best thing television has to offer” .

The best ones are presented individually: An American late-night show, a crime series with a 1920s private detective, “Doctor Who” (from 1963), reruns of Tatort, the British sketch show “Little Britain” and the wacky hospital series “Nurse Jackie” (which is switched off by the hospital patients who are most dependent on television because it is too reminiscent of how wacky things actually are in many German hospitals at the moment).

There are hot programs, but if that's the most beautiful thing that the previously appointed television makers bring about, it is time for their departure.

Even the enjoyment of “funk” could suggest such a diagnosis. The programming of the “non-linear digital content network” (quote from the producer), which replaces ZDFkultur, is presented as an A-Z list of show titles: A Coffee with Moritz Neumeier (do you even need to know him?), On the Toilet (I go alone), BA (aka Barış, if that helps), Bohemian Browser Ballett, Bongo Boulevard, Datteltäter, The Question, Start Living, Fuck You! (You too!), Finalclash, frei.willig.weg (immediately), funk life, Game Two, Germania, Gute Arbeit Originals, Good Morning, Internet! (she trills every morning), Headlinez, upright (is the show unusable?), iam.serafina, Hunters & Gatherers (now it's getting clear: we're that time again), Jana's Diary, Bachelors, Kliemannsland, Kostas Kind, LiDiRo, Living the healthy Choice ('Nutritional advice would have sounded really uncool too'), Open and honest (Of course), Pop Date, Smart as a Cat, StarStarSpace, Superpolypsycholum, Tatort – The Show (turned out to be a yawn), Team Playground, Tourettekette, What about Fabian (and who cares?), Wishlist, World of Wolfram (dry or wet?), Wumms!, Y-Collective, 1080 Nerd Scope.

Marcel Odenbach had already made “different television” with his pirate radio station and in 1989 participated in the first real attempt at alternative program development: the art channel of RTL plus , the first time “artists made television” with noteworthy reach, with around 50 artists filling one week of airtime, during which an audience of 2 million was reached.

What sounds like nothing quickly becomes a sensational success: One only needs to consider that all 2 million viewers must have been people who don't switch off television when the programming is unappealing, but rather channel surf, and who stumbled upon this art channel purely by chance while channel surfing; it can be assumed that RTL plus's regular audience rejects art as "intellectual hyperbole" (one can also add several percent of art lovers who immediately switched channels at the sight of the captivating graphic art of "Klinke").

Because the arts programming at this channel couldn't be developed, visual artists have so far only been able to contribute to the "public space" of television during the rare minutes in which their art is presented.

Currently, with few exceptions, television programming is of a rather low standard, which logically results from measuring success through ratings – what no one finds objectionable is usually just "standardized rubbish." There's murder, murder, and more murder on almost every channel during prime time, countless reruns of the same old classic films and series, and recently, an increasing nuisance of fake "documentaries" that reach dehumanizing levels of stupidity…

This would probably be television's chance, in fulfilling its public service mandate to "ensure a diverse, comprehensive and balanced media offering in the interest of freedom of information and democracy" (program mandate, § 11 para. 2 and 3 of the Interstate Broadcasting Treaty), to become a true reflection of society: Visual artists – and other artists, and many other social groups – would be empowered to independently create television programs within a catalog of democratic, human rights, etc. (to be democratically established) guidelines, which would only have to meet a kind of television law 5 percent hurdle (naturally with much lower percentages, because there are far more socially relevant individual topics than political parties).

Marcel Odenbach, short short biography

• July 7, 1953 Marcel Odenbach was born in Cologne
• 1974 to 1979 studies, architecture, art history and semiotics, Aachen Technical University, completion of Dipl.-Ing.
• 1976 Foundation of the ATV producer group with Ulrike Rosenbach and Klaus vom Bruch
• 1976 to the present day, videos in performances, installations and tapes and two -dimensional pictures
• 1992 Start of teaching as a professor, State University of Design Karlsruhe + Kunsthochschule for Media Cologne (also Vice -Rector)
• 2010 ordinary professorship for film and video at the Düsseldorf Art Academy
• 2010 election in the North Rhine-Westphalian Academy of Sciences and the Arts
• Marcel Odenbach lives mainly in Cologne Ostheim and Ghana and also has an apartment in Berlin.