Tools of generative artificial intelligence (AI) are quickly used in many areas, companies and organizations to create the content of all kinds. These tools offer both a significant way to promote creative and business activity as well as a significant legal risk, up to existence-threatening scenarios for countless artists.
This is primarily due to the existing ambiguities and lack of legal framework, especially with regard toquestions of intellectual property.Generative AIbrings with it a variety of risks, problems and open questions that urgently need a political and law solution.
In this context, some even speaks of the greatest expropriation of intellectual creativeism in human history. The mirrors T the magnitude of the problem again. "
When using generative AI, the interests of authors must finally be observed, the German Cultural Council .
What is the core of the problem?
The German Culture Council has positioned itself in a statement on copyright aspects in the context of artificial intelligence (AI) . It becomes clear that numerous authors, active artists as well as creative minds and companies in the cultural and creative industries are very interested in the application of these new technologies for their work.
They use them and experiment with it. Nevertheless, the German Cultural Council notes, the development of AI not only represents a new technical innovation. Rather, it generates machine -generated results that are increasingly not to be distinguished from human creations and the process of being created cannot be understood by humans. This is a fundamental change, the effects of which have not yet been estimated.
The progressive development of AI models is at a breathtaking pace. In particular, AI models with a general area of application that create content in the form of text, image, audio and video ( "generative AI" ) have developed within a shortest possible time on a central topic of the copyright debate. Generative AI has significant, partly existential -threatening effects on authors as well as on active artists.
This illustration is intended to illustrate the drama of the current debate about copyrights in generative AI and was created with the BILD-KI ImageFlash . The problem: it remains in the dark, which creative creations and training data have been used for this and financial compensation of these creators is more than unlikely at the moment
The same applies to other rights holders such as publishers, film and music producers, game developers or broadcasters. In addition, AI is also of great relevance for educational institutions, memory institutions and libraries. Most actors are confronted with different degrees - both with risks and opportunities.
The copyright questions related to AI are often controversial and urgently need clarification. They are now discussed at international, European and national level, regardless of the fact that they have so far lacked a reliable copyright legal framework .
As early as April 2024, the Stanford Law School examined burning questions about copyright Futurelaw Conference 2024
The pace and the implementation of recommendations for action should be significantly faster in view of the immense threat and financial damage to authors around the world.
What does the German Cultural Council demand?
In its statement, the German Cultural Council initially undertakes a copyright inventory and, on this basis, presents initial considerations for possible legal regulations. It is about copyright regulations in relation to the"input" , i.e. the training of generative AI systems, as well as the "output" , i.e. the use of content that was created by generative AI. It is about transparency and labeling obligations when using content generated by AI.
The German Cultural Council calls for a balance of the interests of all those involved, in particular the consideration of the interests of the authors, exercising artists and all other right -wing holders. "
In the event of use, it is imperative that adequate remuneration is paid that the right-wing owners involved in the economic advantages that arise from the use of protected works and services in AI training and subsequent uses.
Overall, the German Culture Council stimulates a comprehensive legal policy discussion of the open copyright questions. This has not yet taken place sufficiently.
The managing director of the German Cultural Council, Olaf Zimmermann , said literally:
"In connection with artificial intelligence, very complex copyright questions arise. If we do not create a secure legal framework in this topic, authors as well as companies in the cultural and creative industries will get into a situation-threatening situation. to be averted from the cultural sector. "
Owner and Managing Director of Kunstplaza. Journalist, editor, and passionate blogger in the field of art, design, and creativity since 2011. Successful completion of a degree in web design as part of a university study (2008). Further development of creativity techniques through courses in free drawing, expressive painting, and theatre/acting. Profound knowledge of the art market through years of journalistic research and numerous collaborations with actors/institutions from art and culture.
In this magazine rubric you will find numerous reports and articles on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in art , design and architecture .
It is not just about the question of how AI can be used in these areas, but also about the effects of this on creative people.
Because while some experts assume that the use of AI will lead to a revolution in art and design, there are also voices from the industry itself, which are skeptical about AI art and AI-based image generators .
An early example from 2016 for the use of AI in art is the project "The Next Rembrandt" . Software was developed here, which has created a new painting in the Dutch painter's style using data analysis - without human intervention.
The result was surprisingly realistic and already clearly showed the potential of this technology.
What does this development mean for traditional craftsmanship? Are they unnecessary or can new options be created?
Many people deal with these questions equally within and outside of the industry.
In any case, the connection between art and artificial intelligence offers us exciting insights into possible future scenarios.
We cordially invite you to go with us together on a journey of discovery!
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve the browsing experience and to show (non-)personalized ads. If you agree to these technologies, we can process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this website. The refusal or withdrawal of consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Always active
Die technische Speicherung oder der Zugang ist unbedingt erforderlich für den rechtmäßigen Zweck, die Nutzung eines bestimmten Dienstes zu ermöglichen, der vom Teilnehmer oder Nutzer ausdrücklich gewünscht wird, oder für den alleinigen Zweck, die Übertragung einer Nachricht über ein elektronisches Kommunikationsnetz durchzuführen.
Vorlieben
Technical storage or access is required for the lawful purpose of storing preferences that have not been requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistiken
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance by your internet service provider, or additional records from third parties, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
Die technische Speicherung oder der Zugriff ist erforderlich, um Nutzerprofile zu erstellen, um Werbung zu versenden oder um den Nutzer auf einer Website oder über mehrere Websites hinweg zu ähnlichen Marketingzwecken zu verfolgen.
